OCAMPO

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Marsh v. Valyou, 977 So. 2d 543 (Fla. 2007)
  …superseded by the Rules of Evidence), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1117[, 99 S.Ct. 1025, 59 L.Ed.2d 77] (1979), with Christophersen v. Allied-Signal Corp., 939 F. 2d 1106, 1111, 1115-1116 (C.A.5 1991) (en banc) (Frye and the Rules coexist), cert. denied, 503 U.S. 912[, 112 S.Ct. 1280, 117 L.Ed.2d 506] (1992), 3 J. Weinstein & M. Berger, Weinstein’s Evidence ¶ 702[03], pp. 702-36 to 702-37 (1988) (hereinafter Weinstein & Berger) {Frye is dead), and M. Graham, Handbook of Federal Evidence § 703.2 (3d ed. 1991) {Fr…
• Berry v. CSX Transp., Inc., 709 So. 2d 552 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998)
  …elative scientific community”); Christophersen v. Allied-Signal Corp., 939 F. 2d 1106, 1111 (5th Cir.1991)(in applying Frye test ask whether the expert, in reaching his conclusion, used a well founded methodology or mode of reasoning), cert. denied, 503 U.S. 912, 112 S.Ct. 1280, 117 L.Ed.2d 506 (1992); Peteet v. Dow Chem. Co., 868 F. 2d 1428, 1433 (5th Cir.1989)(as long as expert’s methodology is well-founded, the nature of his conclusion is generally irrelevant, even if it is controversial or unique), cert…
• State v. Sercey, 825 So. 2d 959 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002)
  …he expert opinions based upon those theories or methods must also be generally accepted in the scientific community. See Cella v. U.S., 998 F. 2d 418 (7th Cir.1993); Christophersen v. Allied-Signal Corp., 939 F. 2d 1106 (5th Cir.1991), cert. denied, 503 U.S. 912, 112 S.Ct. 1280, 117 L.Ed.2d 506 (1992); Peteet v. Dow Chemical Co., 868 F. 2d 1428 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, Dow Chemical Co. v. Greenhill, 493 U.S. 935, 110 S.Ct. 328, 107 L.Ed.2d 318 (1989); Osburn v. Anchor Laboratories, Inc., 825 F. 2d 908 (5th…