CSOKA

v.

WALDEN ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Hill v. Jones, 81 F.3d 1015 (11th Cir. 1996)
  …er has not yet been decided in this circuit. See Jackson v. Herring, 42 F. 3d 1350, 1358-59 n. 7, 1362 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 116 S.Ct. 38, 132 L.Ed.2d 919 (1995). Citing Hollis v. Davis, 941 F. 2d 1471 (11th Cir.1991), cert. denied, 503 U.S. 938, 112 S.Ct. 1478, 117 L.Ed.2d 621 (1992) and other cases, Hill states this Court has limited Carder to barring from serving as cause only unexhausted as opposed to procedurally-defaulted claims of ineffective assistance. We do not read Hollis or any…
• Hunt v. Hawthorne Assocs., Inc., 119 F.3d 888 (11th Cir. 1997)
  …provided in the plan____ ERISA mandates no minimum substantive content for employee welfare benefit plans, and therefore a court has no authority to draft the substantive content of such plans.”) (citation and quotation marks omitted), cert. denied, 503 U.S. 938, 112 S.Ct. 1479, 117 L.Ed.2d 622 (1992); cf. Nachwalter v. Christie, 805 F. 2d 956, 960 (11th Cir.1986) (written employee benefit plans governed by ERISA may not be modified by oral agreements). We therefore reject the district court’s sub silenti…