YOUNG

v.

HERRING ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Thompson v. Keohane, 516 U.S. 99 (U.S. 1995)
  …[the defendant] and listening to the evidence presented at trial, to determine whether a reasonable person in [defendant’s] position would have felt free to leave the police station.” Purvis v. Dugger, 932 F. 2d 1413, 1419 (CA11 1991), cert. denied, 503 U. S. 940 (1992). It is only in light of these case-specific determinations that the reasonable person test can be meaningfully applied. See Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp., supra, at 402 (“Familiar with the issues and litigants, the [trial] court is better…
• United States v. Waymer, 55 F.3d 564 (11th Cir. 1995)
  …ired for checks to be picked up, but that they kept no records of which checks were mailed and which were picked up. Mailing can be proved through circumstantial evidence. United States v. Metallo, 908 F. 2d 795, 798 (11th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 503 U.S. 940, 112 S.Ct. 1483, 117 L.Ed.2d 625 (1992). Proof of a routine practice of using the mail to accomplish a business end is sufficient to support a jury’s determination that mailing occurred in a particular instance. Id. This Court has not previously…
• United States v. Massey, 89 F.3d 1433 (11th Cir. 1996)
  …‘it was the practice of the business activity to make the ... record,’ is admissible unless circumstances ‘indicate lack of trustworthiness.’ ” United States v. Metallo, 908 F. 2d 795, 799 (11th Cir.1990) (quoting Fed.R.Evid. 803(6)), cert. denied, 503 U.S. 940, 112 S.Ct. 1483, 117 L.Ed.2d 625 (1992). Prior to admitting the restaurant guest cheeks and receipts into evidence, the district court permitted defense counsel to voir dire the witness as to each document. Venezia, the owner of Buccione, identifi…