RICHMOND

v.

LEWIS, DIRECTOR, ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Growe v. Emison, 507 U.S. 25 (U.S. 1993)
  …6. Appellants sought a stay of the District Court’s February order pending this appeal. Justice Blackmun granted the stay with respect to the legislative redistricting plan. No. 91-1420 (Mar. 11, 1992) (in chambers). We noted probable jurisdiction. 503 U. S. 958 (1992). [*32] HH H-i In their challenge to both of the District Court s redistricting plans, appellants contend that, under the principles of Scott v. Germano, 381 U. S. 407 (1965) (per curiam), the court erred in not deferring to the Minnesota Spe…
• Spectrum Sports, Inc. v. McQUILLAN et vir, 506 U.S. 447 (U.S. 1993)
  …s, conflicts with holdings of courts in other Circuits. Every other Court of Appeals has indicated that proving an attempt to monopolize requires proof of a dangerous probability of monopolization of a relevant market.5 We [*454] granted certiorari, 503 U. S. 958 (1992), to resolve this conflict among the Circuits.6 We reverse. II While § 1 of the Sherman Act forbids contracts or conspiracies in restraint of trade or commerce, § 2 addresses the actions of single firms that monopolize or attempt to monopoli…
• Richmond v. Lewis, 506 U.S. 40 (U.S. 1992)
  …relative sense; the same, however, cannot be said under the terms of the Arizona statute at issue here.” 948 F. 2d 1473, 1488-1489 (1992). The Ninth Circuit denied rehearing en banc, with four judges dissenting. Id., at 1476. We granted certiorari, 503 U. S. 958 (1992), and now reverse. f — i 1 — ( Petitioner challenges his death sentence imposed at resen-tencing in 1980. He argues that the “especially heinous, cruel or depraved” aggravating factor specified by Ariz. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 13 — 703(F)(6) (1989…