REYNOLDS

v.

LOCAL 24, UNITED STEEL WORKERS OF AMERICA, ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Dist. OF Columbia v. Greater Wash. Bd. of Trade, 506 U.S. 125 (U.S. 1992)
  …Second Circuit’s decision in R. R. Donnelley & Sons Co. v. Prevost, 915 F. 2d 787 (1990), cert. denied, 499 U. S. 947 (1991), which upheld against a pre-emption challenge a Connecticut law substantially similar to § 2(c)(2), we granted certiorari. 503 U. S. 970 (1992). We now affirm. b — I HH We have repeatedly stated that a law “relate[s] to” a covered employee benefit plan for purposes of § 514(a) “if it has a connection with or reference to such a plan.” Shaw, supra, at 97. E. g., Ingersoll-Rand Co.…
• Teper v. Zell Miller, 82 F.3d 989 (11th Cir. 1996)
  …A interpretation issued via decision letter entitled to deference, noting that interpretation was given “in order to resolve an important and recurring matter before it,” and that "agency has applied this interpretation consistently”), cert. denied, 503 U.S. 970, 112 S.Ct. 1584, 118 L.Ed.2d 304 (1992). . The Chevron Court articulated this rationale in passages such as this: Judges are not experts in the field, and are not part of either political branch of the Government. ... When a challenge to an agency c…
• Newark Morning Ledger Co. v. United States, 507 U.S. 546 (U.S. 1993)
  …s suggestion for rehearing in banc, with two judges dissenting. See App. to [*553] Pet. for Cert. 52a. In order to resolve an issue of substantial importance under the Internal Revenue Code and to settle a perceived conflict,5 we granted certiorari, 503 U. S. 970 (1992). II Section 167(a) of the Code allows as a deduction for depreciation a reasonable allowance for the exhaustion and wear and tear, including obsolescence, of property used in a trade or business or of property held for the production of inc…