MARINO ET AL.

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Finney v. State, 660 So. 2d 674 (Fla. 1995)
  …ney’s inconsistent statements concerning his interactions with the victim and his activities on the day of the murder, the jury was free to reject Finney’s version of events as unreasonable. Bedford v. State, 589 So. 2d 245 (Fla.1991), cert. denied, 503 U.S. 1009, 112 S.Ct. 1773, 118 L.Ed.2d 432 (1992). Finney’s argument that the State did not present evidence that was inconsistent with every hypothesis except premeditation is based on the proffered testimony of Dr. Diggs that the murder scene was consisten…
• Chavez v. State, 832 So. 2d 730 (Fla. 2002)
  …the conclusion that at some point he was held against his will is inescapable. Cf. Sochor v. State, 619 So. 2d 285 (Fla.), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1025, 114 S.Ct. 638, 126 L.Ed.2d 596 (1993); Bedford v. State, 589 So. 2d 245 (Fla.1991), cert. denied, 503 U.S. 1009, 112 S.Ct. 1773, 118 L.Ed.2d 432 (1992). The details in [*763] Schwab’s statements correspond well with the physical evidence. Therefore, we hold that the state submitted sufficient proof of the corpus delicti to admit Schwab’s admissions that he ki…
• Sliney v. State, 699 So. 2d 662 (Fla. 1997)
  …dicates that the upward departure was based upon Sliney’s first-degree murder conviction. We have held that a first-degree murder conviction may constitute a valid reason for departure. Bedford v. State, 589 So. 2d 245, 254 (Fla.1991), cert. denied, 503 U.S. 1009, 112 S.Ct. 1773, 118 L.Ed.2d 432 (1992). This is trae regardless of whether points have been scored for victim injury on the guideline scoresheet. Id. Having reviewed the entire record and finding no reversible error, we affirm Sliney’s convictions…