LOCKHART, DIRECTOR, ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION

v.

FRETWELL

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Olano, 507 U.S. 725 (U.S. 1993)
  …s vacated respondents’ remaining convictions and did not reach the other “substantial issues” that they had raised. Id., at 1428, n. 3. We granted certiorari to clarify the standard for “plain error” review by the courts of appeals under Rule 52(b). 504 U. S. 908 (1992). II “No procedural principle is more familiar to this Court than that a constitutional right,” or a right of any other sort, “may be forfeited in criminal as well as civil cases by the failure to make timely assertion of the right before a…
• Lockhart v. Fretwell, 506 U.S. 364 (U.S. 1993)
  …only on the probable effect of counsel’s error at the time of Fretwell’s sentencing, the majority misses the broader and more important point that his sentencing proceeding reached neither an unreliable nor an unfair result”). We granted certiorari, 504 U. S. 908 (1992), and now reverse. Our decisions have emphasized that the Sixth Amendment right to counsel exists “in order to protect .the fundamental right to a fair trial.” Strickland v. Washington, supra, at 684; Nix v. Whiteside, 475 U. S. 157, 175 (198…
• Isaacs v. Head, 300 F.3d 1232 (11th Cir. 2002)
  …e because the inmate was not in custody for purposes of Miranda. Id. at 1492. . The Supreme Court granted certiorari in Green and considered whether the Edwards protections should apply to a defendant in his situation. See United States v. Green, 504 U.S. 908, 112 S.Ct. 1935, 118 L.Ed.2d 542 (1992). During oral arguments, “a number of justices asked questions that indicated their concern about the duration of Green’s question-proof status after he invoked his right to counsel.” Clark, 781 A. 2d at 941.…