GEORGE W. GREEN, RICHARD H. KNAPP, ET UX.,
v.
WM. L. FREDERICKSEN, ET AL., AS TRUSTEES AND DIRECTORS FOR STUART DEVELOPMENT COMPANY
GEORGE W. GREEN, RICHARD H. KNAPP, ET UX.,
WM. L. FREDERICKSEN, ET AL., AS TRUSTEES AND DIRECTORS FOR STUART DEVELOPMENT COMPANY
133 Fla. 429
Florida Supreme Court (1938)
Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 182 So. 785
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion of the Court
—The record shows that the final decree herein was entered by the Circuit Judge on January 28th, 1938; that it was filed January 29th, 1938, and recorded that day in Chancery Order Book No. 7 at page 526.
*430The notice of appeal refers to final decree entered Feb-, ruary 23rd, 1938, recorded in Chancery Order, Book No. 7 at page 403.
No decree identified in the notice of appeal is found in the transcript of record.
Therefore, the appeal should be, and is now, dismissed.
So ordered.
Dismissed.
Ellis, C. J., and Whitfield, Brown, Buford and Chapman, J. J., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Seaboard AIR Line R.R. Co. v. Holt, 80 So. 2d 354 (Fla. 1955)…der we stated: ' ‘/The motion to dismiss the appeal must be'granted under the principles laid down in Brown v. Louisville Fire & Marine Ins. Co., Fla.1950, 47 So. 2d 862, and Longo v. Alweiss, Fla.1953, 65 So. 2d 556; see also Green v. Fredericksen, 133 Fla. 429, 182 So. 785.” The precise question then, as now, presented for our determination is whether the notice of appeal filed in this case by appellant substantially complies with the form of notice of appeal which follows Rule 39 of the Supreme Court Ru…1 / 2