RANDY RICHARDSON, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1969-11-04
No. 69-326
Before BARKDULL, HENDRY and SWANN, JJ.
228 So. 2d 117 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1969) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Chavers v. State, Fla.1950, 45 So.2d 180; Herring v. State, 131 Fla. 627, 180 So. 15 (1938); and Fla.R.Cr.Pr. 1.510, 1.530 and 1.570, 33 F.S.A.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Grady Eugene Jenkins v. State, 228 So. 2d 114 (Fla. 3d DCA 1969)
    …counsel and no objection was entered as to the joint representation by a single attorney. They were both adjudicated guilty and sentenced for the crime charged. The co-defendant has prosecuted a separate appeal. See Jennings v. State, Fla.App.1969, 228 So. 2d 117, Third District Court of Appeal opinion released this date. As his first point on appeal, Jenkins contends that the trial court erred by failing to appoint separate counsel for himself and his co-defendant. The record shows that no demand was made…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw