CAMPBELL

v.

DONDERO ET AL.; HOANG V. SIMS ET AL.; GAGE V. BORG, WARDEN; BANKS V. CALIFORNIA; JEFFRESS V. JEFFRESS; ABATE V. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT ET AL.; REID V. CITY OF FLINT; NABKEY V. PECKERAL ET AL.; ROSS V. DAKOTA RAIL, INC., ET AL.; JONES V. MURRAY, DIRECTOR, VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; CORDLE V. SQUARE D CO.; YOUNG V. UNITED STATES; GAMBLE V. WEBSTER, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MISSOURI; SOLIS V. TEXAS

Citator

Cited By

• Dillard v. Baldwin Cnty. Comm'rs, 376 F.3d 1260 (11th Cir. 2004)
  …impaired.”); Rodriguez, 308 F. Supp. 2d at 378; Illinois Legislative Redistricting Comm’n v. LaPaille, 786 F.Supp. 704, 715-17 (N.D.Ill.1992) (three-judge panel); Turner v. Arkansas, 784 F.Supp. 558, 568-72 (E,D.Ark.l991) (three-judge panel), aff'd, 504 U.S. 952, 112 S.Ct. 2296, 119 L.Ed.2d 220 (1992); Hastert v. State Bd. of Elections, 111 F.Supp. 634, 652-54 (N.D.Ill.1991) (three-judge panel). The clear message of these eases, consistent with Gingles, is that a minority group cannot be awarded relief on…
• Tennant v. Jefferson Cnty. Comm'n, 567 U.S. 758 (U.S. 2012)
  …some variance, including, for instance, . . . ”). The desire to minimize population shifts between districts is clearly a valid, neutral state policy. See, [*765] e. g., Turner v. Arkansas, 784 F. Supp. 585, 588-589 (ED Ark. 1991), summarily aff’d, 504 U.S. 952 (1992). S. B. 1008 achieves significantly lower population shifts than the alternative plans—more than 4 times lower .than the closest alternative, and more than 25 times lower than others. None of the alternative plans came close to vindicating al…