J. P. SPEIGHT AND A. LIVINGSTON AND F. L. CANTEY, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS CO-PARTNERS DOING BUSINESS UNDER THE STYLE AND FIRM NAME OF MADISON TOBACCO COMPANY, AND J. P. SPEIGHT AND F. L. CANTEY, CO-PARTNERS DOING BUSINESS UNDER THE FIRM NAME AND STYLE OF SPEIGHT & CANTEY, PETITIONERS,

v.

M. F. HORNE, JUDGE OF THE THIRD JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA IN AND FOR MADISON COUNTY, AND ETHEL D. ROWE, RESPONDENTS

Fla. | 1931-04-04

Buford, C.J., and Whitfield, Ellis, Terrell and Brown, J.J., concur.

101 Fla. 109 Florida Supreme Court (1931) Positive Treatment

Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court

Davis, J.

This case is a companion ease to the case of J. P. Speight and A. Livingston and F. L. Cantey, individually and as copartners doing business under the style and firm name of Madison Tobacco Company, Petitioners, versus M. F. Horne, Judge of the Third Judicial Circuit of the State of Florida in and for Madison County, and A. L. Rowe, *110Respondents. The pleadings and points of law involved here are in substance the same as were involved in the ease just mentioned. The cases were argued together, and on authority of the foregoing case, the demurrer of the relator to the return of the respondent should be sustained.

It is so ordered.

Buford, C.J., and Whitfield, Ellis, Terrell and Brown, J.J., concur.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

State v. Burton Barrs, 105 Fla. 27 (Fla. 1932)

…Civil Court of Record of Duval County was about to take further proceedings in said cause against him without having acquired jurisdiction over his person through the sendee o'f a proper summons [*29] ad respondendum, or otherwise. Speight v. Horne, 101 Fla. 109, 133 Sou. Rep. 574, 577. This Court granted the rule nisi and the cause is now before the Court on the demurrer of the respondent Judge to the relator’s suggestion for a writ of prohibition absolute. Chapter 14664, Acts of 1931, reads as follows:…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw