HEXAMER
v.
FIRST GIBRALTAR SAVINGS ASSN.

U.S. | 1992-10-05
No. 91-1613
506 U.S. 815 Supreme Court of the United States (1992) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Austin v. United States, 509 U.S. 602 (U.S. 1993)
    …conflict with the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit over the applicability of the Eighth Amendment to in rem civil forfeitures. See United States v. Certain Real Property, 954 F. 2d 29, 35, 38-39, cert. denied sub nom. Levin v. United States, 506 U. S. 815 (1992). II Austin contends that the Eighth Amendment’s Excessive Fines Clause applies to in rem civil forfeiture proceedings. See Brief for Petitioner 10,19, 23. We have had occasion to consider this Clause only once before. In Browning-Ferris Ind…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw