FEATHERLITE PRECAST CORP.
v.
PLEDGER, DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE AND ADMINISTRATION OF ARKANSAS, ET AL.
FEATHERLITE PRECAST CORP.
PLEDGER, DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE AND ADMINISTRATION OF ARKANSAS, ET AL.
506 U.S. 826
Supreme Court of the United States (1992)
Caution
Cited by 8 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Daubert et ux. v. Merrell Dow Pharms., Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (U.S. 1993)…g that scientific evidence that provided foundation for expert testimony, viewed in the light most favorable to plaintiffs, was not sufficient to allow a jury to find it more probable than not that defendant caused plaintiff’s injury), cert. denied, 506 U. S. 826 (1992); Brock v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 874 F. 2d 307 (CA5 1989) (reversing judgment entered on jury verdict for plaintiffs because evidence regarding causation was insufficient), modified, 884 F. 2d 166 (CA5 1989), cert. denied, 494 U.…
-
Gen. Elec. Co. v. Joiner et ux., 522 U.S. 136 (U.S. 1997)…g data only by the ipse dixit of the expert. A court may conclude that there is simply too great an analytical gap between the data and the opinion proffered. See Turpin v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 959 F. 2d 1349, 1360 (CA6), cert. denied, 506 U. S. 826 (1992). That is what the District Court did here, and we hold that it did not abuse its discretion in so doing. We hold, therefore, that abuse of discretion is the proper standard by which to review a district court’s decision to admit or exclude s…
-
Harris v. Shelby Cnty. Bd. OF Educ., 99 F.3d 1078 (11th Cir. 1996)…nd Rogers’ decision not to recommend him for the principalship at Thompson High School. See 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2(m); Fuller v. Phipps, 67 F. 3d 1137, 1142 (4th Cir.1995); Tyler v. Bethlehem Steel Corp., 958 F. 2d 1176, 1181 (2nd Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 826, 113 S.Ct. 82, 121 L.Ed.2d 46 (1992). We therefore remand to the district court for further proceedings on that issue. As noted above, Harris’ Title VII claim is viable only as to the Board itself. Thus, the remand affects only that defendant. F…
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence