VILD

v.

VISCONSI ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Rankin v. Evans, 133 F.3d 1425 (11th Cir. 1998)
  …and inferences so strongly favor one party “that reasonable people, in the exercise of impartial judgment, could not arrive at a contrary verdict.” Bailey v. Board of County Comm’rs of Alachua County, 956 F. 2d 1112, 1119 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 832, 113 S.Ct. 98, 121 L.Ed.2d 58 (1992). If so, the motion was properly granted. We must also keep in mind, however, that a “mere scintilla of evidence does not create a jury question; there must be a substantial conflict in evidence to create a jury q…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• United States v. Dickerson, 248 F.3d 1036 (11th Cir. 2001)
  …e to determine whether there is “fair support” in the record for district court’s conclusion that the juror would be impartial. See, e.g., Bailey v. Bd. of County Comm’rs, 956 F. 2d 1112, 1128-29 (11th Cir.), cert. denied sub nom. Hayes v. Bailey, 506 U.S. 832, 113 S.Ct. 98, 121 L.Ed.2d 58 (1992). The record below establishes that the District Court ensured that the challenged juror would be able to evaluate the evidence objectively and render a fair decision. The jurors in Martin and Bailey made statem…