BROWN

v.

BROWN ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Oisorio v. State, 676 So. 2d 1363 (Fla. 1996)
  …trict acknowledged that its decision conflicted with Gill. However, the court declined to certify conflict because it recognized that Gill was based on an erroneous interpretation of United States v. Teague, 953 F. 2d 1525 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 842, 113 S.Ct. 127, 121 L.Ed.2d 82 (1992), and its companion case Nichols v. Butler, 953 F. 2d 1550 (11th Cir.1992). Oisorio, 657 So. 2d at 5. In Teague, the Eleventh Circuit concluded that Strickland provided the appropriate means of addressing claims…
• Gallego v. United States, 174 F.3d 1196 (11th Cir. 1999)
  …stify. A claim of ineffective assistance of counsel is the proper framework to analyze defendant’s allegation that his attorney has violated his right to testify. See United States v. Teague, 953 F. 2d 1525, 1534 (11th Cir.) (en banc) cert. denied, 506 U.S. 842, 113 S.Ct. 127, 121 L.Ed.2d 82 (1992). A criminal defendant has a “fundamental constitutional right to testify in his or her own behalf at trial. This right is personal to the defendant and cannot be waived either by the trial court or by defense c…
• Penton v. Sec'y, Dep't of Corrections(Pasco County) (M.D. Fla. 2025)
  …dvice prevented him from testifying. A defendant's right to testify at a criminal trial is a fundamental and personal right that defense counsel cannot waive. See United States v. Teague, 953 F.2d 1525, 1532 (11th Cir. 1992) (en banc), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 842 (1992). In Teague, the Eleventh Circuit held that it is defense counsel's responsibility to advise the defendant of this right and the strategic implications and “that the appropriate vehicle for claims that the defendant's right to testify was viol…