RUSSELL

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Perla Martin Davis, 117 F.3d 459 (11th Cir. 1997)
  …thority to order restitution for the losses caused by the entire fraud scheme, not merely for the losses caused by the specific acts of fraud proved by the government at trial.” United States v. Brothers, 955 F. 2d 493, 497 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 847, 113 S.Ct. 142, 121 L.Ed.2d 94 (1992). Each appellant herein had a sufficiently substantial involvement in the fraud scheme to warrant the restitution amount that the district court ordered. See United States v. Barnette, 10 F. 3d 1553, 1556 (11th…
• Blaik v. United States, 117 F.3d 1288 (11th Cir. 1997)
  …specific conduct requirement of Hughey), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 837, 114 S.Ct. 115, 126 L.Ed.2d 80, and cert. denied, 510 U.S. 919, 114 S.Ct. 314, 126 L.Ed.2d 261 (1993); United States v. Brothers, 955 F. 2d 493, 497 (7th Cir.) (same), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 847, 113 S.Ct. 142, 121 L.Ed.2d 94 (1992). . Without any recognition of the relevant version of the VWPA or Barnette, both of which controlled restitution at the time of Blaik's sentencing, the district court, in its order denying Blaik's § 2255 motion,…