HOLMES ET AL.

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Republic of Panama v. Bcci Holdings (Luxembourg) S.A., 119 F.3d 935 (11th Cir. 1997)
  …defendant agreed to the overall objective of the conspiracy; or (2) by showing that the defendant agreed to commit two predicate acts. United States v. Church, 955 F. 2d 688, 694 (11th Cir.) (internal quotations and citations omitted), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 881, 113 S.Ct. 233, 121 L.Ed.2d 169 (1992); United States v. Kopituk, 690 F. 2d 1289, 1323 (11th Cir.1982) (noting that it is sufficient that defendant knows of the “essential nature of the plan”) (citations omitted), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 928, 103 S.C…
• United States v. Shenberg, 89 F.3d 1461 (11th Cir. 1996)
  …r their codefendants on other counts alleging similar or related conduct is relevant to the issue of whether sufficient evidence supports appellants’ RICO conspiracy convictions. United States v. Church, 955 F. 2d 688, 695 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 881, 113 S.Ct. 233, 121 L.Ed.2d 169 (1992). These verdicts though seemingly inconsistent “could [have] easily [been] the result of mistake or lenity by the jury in acquittal as they could be proof of lack of evidence to support the conviction.” Church…
• United States v. Castro, 89 F.3d 1443 (11th Cir. 1996)
  …the sufficiency of the evidence de novo, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the government and drawing all reasonable inferences in favor of the jury’s verdict. United States v. Church, 955 F. 2d 688, 693 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 881, 113 S.Ct. 233, 121 L.Ed.2d 169 (1992). In evaluating whether the indictment was constructively amended, we review the district court’s jury instructions and the prosecutor’s summation “in context” to determine whether an expansion of the indictme…

  ← 1 / 2 →