ROSENTHAL

v.

CONRAD ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Cottrell v. Caldwell, 85 F.3d 1480 (11th Cir. 1996)
  …. 2d 1104, 1107 (11th Cir.1992) (“A panel of this Court may decline to follow a decision of a prior panel if such action is necessary in order to give full effect to an intervening decision of the Supreme Court of the United States.”), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 917, 113 S.Ct. 326, 121 L.Ed.2d 246 (1992). Accordingly, under Johnson, we lack interlocutory appellate jurisdiction over the denial of summary judgment on qualified immunity grounds where the sole issues on appeal are issues of evidentiary sufficiency…
• Raven v. Oppenheimer & Co., Inc., 74 F.3d 239 (11th Cir. 1996)
  …01 U.S. at 541-44, 111 S.Ct. at 2446-48, 115 L.Ed.2d at 492-93. Because the limitation period required by Lampf was applied to the litigants in that case, this court recognized, in Lufkin v. McCollum, 956 F. 2d 1104, 1108 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 917, 113 S.Ct. 326, 121 L.Ed.2d 246 (1992), that it must be enforced with respect to similarly situated parties. See Henderson v. Scientific-Atlanta, Inc., 971 F. 2d 1567, 1569 (11th Cir.1992), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 95, 126 L.Ed.2d 62 (1993…
• Hurley v. United States, 507 U.S. 954 (U.S. 1993)
  …[*954] 506 U. S. 817; 506 U. S. 854; 506 U. S. 917; 506 U. S. 976; 506 U. S. 1022; 506 U. S. 1047; 506 U. S. 893; 506 U. S. 1002; 506 U. S. 958; 506 U. S. 961; 506 U. S. 977; 506 U. S. 988; 506 U. S. 978; [*955] No. 92-6011. No. 92-6017. No. 92-6020. No. 92-6022. No. 92-6023. No. 92-6041. No. 92-607…