MITCHELL ET AL.

v.

UNITED TEACHERS-LOS ANGELES

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Bestfoods, 524 U.S. 51 (U.S. 1998)
  …., 996 F. 2d 1107, 1110 (CA11 1993) (same), and Nurad, Inc. v. William E. Hooper & Sons Co., 966 F. 2d 837, 842 (CA4) (parent having authority to control subsidiary is liable as an operator, even if it did not exercise that authority), cert. denied, 506 U. S. 940 (1992). There is significant disagreement among courts and commentators over whether, in enforcing CERCLA’s indirect liability, courts should borrow state law, or instead apply a federal common law of veil piercing. Compare, e. g., 118 F. 3d, at 58…
• Redwing Carriers, Inc. v. Saraland Apts., 94 F.3d 1489 (11th Cir. 1996)
  …t person actually supervises the activities of the facility. That is, the person must play an active role in the actual management of the enterprise. Id. Citing Nurad, Inc. v. William E. Hooper & Sons Co., 966 F. 2d 837 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 940, 113 S.Ct. 377, 121 L.Ed.2d 288 (1992), Redwing argues the Hub-ton partners are operators of the Saraland Site because they have the authority to control the property. In Nurad, the Fourth Circuit reasoned subsection 107(a)(2) imposes operator liab…
• Melendez v. United States, 518 U.S. 120 (U.S. 1996)
  …supra, at 127-130, the Application Notes to §5K1.1 and §2D1.1 do not compel any other reading. The judgment is affirmed. It is so ordered. Compare 55 F. 3d 130 (CA3 1995) and United States v. Rodriguez-Morales, 958 F. 2d 1441 (CA8), cert. denied, 506 U. S. 940 (1992), with United States v. Ah-Kai, 951 F. 2d 490 (CA2 1991), United States v. Beckett, 996 F. 2d 70 (CA5 1993), United States v. Wills, 35 F. 3d 1192 (CA7 1994), and United States v. Keene, 933 F. 2d 711 (CA9 1991). Petitioner also argues for th…