JOHN T. COCKRELL, PETITIONER,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT

Fla. | 1969-10-08
No. 37917
ERVIN, C. J., THORNAL, CARLTON and BOYD, JJ., and RAWLS, District Court Judge, concur.
229 So. 2d 587 Florida Supreme Court (1969) Positive Treatment
Cited by 5 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari reflected probable jurisdiction in this Court. After argument and upon further consideration, we have determined the writ was improvidently issued. The writ must be and is discharged and the petition is dismissed.

It is so ordered.

ERVIN, C. J., THORNAL, CARLTON and BOYD, JJ., and RAWLS, District Court Judge, concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Scott v. Williams, 107 So. 3d 379 (Fla. 2013)
    …Because the Sheriffs case did not reach or contemplate changes such as these, this Court is bound to follow the express language of section 121.011(3)(d), Florida Statutes. The trial court concluded, and I agree, that under State v. Gadsden County, 229 So. 2d 587 (Fla.1969), the Legislature can, as part of its power to contract, authorize a contract which vests rights that a future legislature cannot impair; and the court below concluded that the Legislature did so when it adopted section 121.011(3)(d). The…
    1 / 2
  • State v. Orange Cnty., 281 So. 2d 310 (Fla. 1973)
    …9 (1941); and that continuing line of cases prior to the 1968 constitutional change were expressly overruled in our State v. County of Dade, supra. Prescott v. Board of Public Instruction, 159 Fla. 663, 32 So. 2d 731 (1947); State v. Gadsden County, 229 So. 2d 587 (Fla.1969), and related cases did not deal with the basic question here as to a requirement for referendum. The appellee’s contention that dicta in Davis v. Gronemeyer, 251 So. 2d 1 (Fla.1971), is unduly restrictive and if adhered to by the court w…
    1 / 2
  • Thompson v. Haynes, 36 Fla. Supp. 110 (Duval Cty. Cir. Ct. 1971)
    …n any tangible or intangible property of defendant, in the possession of or control of a third person . . . In Florida, some of the cases touching upon the matters involved in this cause are as follows — Nationwood Mutual Insurance Co. v. McNulty, 229 So. 2d 587, held, inter alia, as follows — [*113] . . . Accordingly, when an insurer under such a policy contract undertakes to defend an action against the insured and becomes involved in negotiations for settlement, the law imposes the duty that it act in go…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw