HARRIS

v.

SINGLETARY, SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Brooke Grp. Ltd. v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 509 U.S. 209 (U.S. 1993)
  …Court of Appeals’ view, “[t]o rely on the characteristics of an oligopoly to assure recoupment of losses from a predatory pricing scheme after one oligopolist has made a competitive move is ... economically irrational.” Ibid. We granted certiorari, 506 U. S. 984 (1992), and now affirm. II A Price discrimination is made unlawful by § 2(a) of the Clayton Act, 38 Stat. 730, as amended by the Robinson-Patman Act, which provides: “It shall be unlawful for any person engaged in commerce, in the course of such…
• Cisneros v. Alpine Ridge Grp., 508 U.S. 10 (U.S. 1993)
  …ongress’ attempt to authorize such caps through the Reform Act unconstitutionally deprived respondents of their “vested property interest in formula-based rent adjustments pursuant to their section 8 contracts.” Id., at 1387. We granted certiorari, 506 U. S. 984 (1992), and now reverse. II We begin our analysis of respondents’ due process claim with the assistance contracts. Because we find that those contracts do not prohibit the use of comparability studies to impose an independent cap on the formula-ba…