SAARI

v.

SMITH BARNEY, HARRIS UPHAM & CO., INC.

Citator

Cited By

• In re Jove Eng'g, Inc. v. Internal Revenue Serv., 92 F.3d 1539 (11th Cir. 1996)
  …characterized the automatic stay of 11 U.S.C. § 362(a) as “essentially a court-ordered injunction, [and] any person or entity who violates the stay may be found in contempt of court.” Carver v. Carver, 954 F. 2d 1573, 1578 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 986, 113 S.Ct. 496, 121 L.Ed.2d 434 (1992). Although essentially a court-ordered injunction, the automatic stay nevertheless is actually a legislative creation with unique properties different from court-ordered injunctions. As its common name suggest…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Long v. Mango's Tropical Cafe, Inc., 958 F. Supp. 612 (S.D. Fla. 1997)
• United States v. Dixon, 509 U.S. 690 (U.S. 1993)
  …ee, e. g., Sharpton v. Turner, 964 F. 2d 1284, 1287 (CA2) (Grady formulation “has proven difficult to apply” and “whatever difficulties we have previously encountered in grappling with the Grady language have not been eased by” Felix), cert. denied, 506 U. S. 986 (1992); Ladner v. Smith, 941 F. 2d 356, 362, 364 (CA5 1991) (a divided court adopts a four-part test for application of Grady and notes that Grady, “even if carefully analyzed and painstakingly administered, is not easy to apply”), cert. denied, 503…