RODRIGUEZ

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (11 total)

• City OF Panama City v. Head, 797 So. 2d 1265 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001)
  …roceedings. See Mennonite. REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. ERVIN AND DAVIS, JJ., CONCUR. . As Justice Scalia explained in his dissenting opinion in Ada v. Guam Society of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, 506 U.S. 1011, 113 S.Ct. 633, 121 L.Ed.2d 564 (1992), courts rarely declare statutes facially unconstitutional because to do so there must exist "no set of circumstances in which the statute can constitutionally be applied;” whereas “[t]he practical effect of hol…
• United States v. Calderon, 127 F.3d 1314 (11th Cir. 1997)
  …he underlying conspiracy, [ ] it only needs to come forward with slight evidence to connect a particular defendant to the conspiracy.” Id. (citing United States v. Gates, 967 F. 2d 497, 499 (11th Cir.), cert. denied sub nom. Burley v. United States, 506 U.S. 1011, 113 S.Ct. 632, 121 L.Ed.2d 563 (1992)). We have described this as a “minimal threshold” that may be passed on either direct or circumstantial evidence. Id. Further, the conclusion that appellants had a common purpose and plan with the other cocon…
• Hill v. Colorado, 530 U.S. 703 (U.S. 2000)
  …uestionably the exclusive preserve of the First Amendment. See Janklow v. Planned Parenthood, Sioux Falls Clinic, 517 U. S. 1174, 1177-1181 (1996) (Scalia, J., dissenting from denial of certiorari); Ada v. Guam Soc. of Obstetricians & Gynecologists, 506 U. S. 1011, 1013 (1992) (Scalia, J., dissenting from denial of certiorari). Does the deck seem stacked? You bet. As I have suggested throughout this opinion, today’s decision is not an isolated distortion of our traditional constitutional principles, but is o…