CORTEZ
v.
FIRST CITY NATIONAL BANK OF HOUSTON ET AL.; PRINCE V. UNITED STATES; PACYNA V. STONE, SECRETARY OF THE ARMY; MILLER V. BRIGGS ET AL.; U. E. ENTERPRISES, INC., ET AL. V. NEW YORK CHINESE TV PROGRAMS, INC.; RICH ET AL. V. UNITED STATES; SHIIMI V. HARLANDALE INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT; BROWN V. INDIANA; CROWLEY V. PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY, MARYLAND; BOYLES V. INDIANA; MASAT V. UNITED STATES; SHUMATE V. NCNB FINANCIAL SERVICES ET AL.; MEDERS V. GEORGIA; FANNY V. LEVY ET AL.; TODD V. GEORGIA; MOODY V. TEXAS; CARTER V. HARFORD COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT ET AL.; TUDOROV V. COLLAZO; JUNGBLUT V. CRIST, WARDEN; JACOBS ET AL. V. DUJMOVIC ET AL.; ASHMUS V. CALIFORNIA; SLEDGE V. MEYERS, WARDEN; JONES V. LEWIS ET AL.; EDWARDS V. CALIFORNIA; JACKSON V. SOUTH TEXAS COLLEGE OF LAW ET AL.; FROST V. OHIO; CALDWELL V. TOM MISTICK & SONS ET AL.; SAYLOR V. VIRGINIA; HAWKINS V. CALIFORNIA; BENNETT V. DIRECTOR OF THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; GORDON V. UNITED STATES, IN RE JACKSON, BAUER V. UNITED STATES; CHRYSLER CORP. V. INTERNATIONAL UNION, ALLIED INDUSTRIAL WORKERS OF AMERICA, AFL-CIO, ET AL.; FERMIN V. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, IN RE ANDERSON, BARBER V. SOMERVILLE HOSPITAL, INC., ET AL.; CRAWFORD ET VIR V. LEAHY ET AL.; MOZEE ET AL. V. AMERICAN COMMERCIAL MARINE SERVICE CO.; CLARKE V. BUTCHER ET AL.; SANTANA DIAZ V. UNITED STATES; BANKS V. KAYE; RUB V. FEDERAL LAND BANK OF ST. PAUL; QAHDAFI V. VIRGINIA; WILLE V. LOUISIANA; JOHNSON V. SULLIVAN, SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, ET AL. (TWO CASES); DAWN ET UX. V. MARGOLIS ET AL.; LAWRENCE V. BRADY, SECRETARY OF THE TREASURY; KIRIENKO V. KIRIENKO; VISCIOTTI V. CALIFORNIA; WILEY V. CORRECTIONS CABINET OF KENTUCKY ET AL.; SPIVEY V. BRICE-WELLINGTON; WHITTLESEY V. MARYLAND; OMOIKE V. EXXON CO.; BARSTEN V. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR; MITCHELL V. EBERHART, WARDEN; TWYMAN V. ALABAMA; WINTERS V. IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY; BEVERLY ET UX. V. UNITED STATES; KOT V. PATERNOSTER ET AL.
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court affirmed a Commission on Ethics order finding a city commissioner violated ethics statutes by his employment with city franchisees and by using city stationery for personal promotion, but reversed a finding related to a sign variance due to improper agency review.
The court affirmed the commission's findings that Gordon violated ethics statutes regarding his employment with franchisees and use of city stationery, but reversed a finding related to a sign variance due to the commission's improper modification of the hearing officer's findings of fact.
James K. Gordon, a city commissioner, appealed a Commission on Ethics order finding he violated ethics statutes. The violations included employment wi…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
ante, p. 815; ante, p. 816; No. 91-1799. No. 91-1847. No. 91-2002. No. 91-7408. No. 91-7563. No. 91-7697. No. 91-7760. No. 91-7797. No. 91-8108. No. 91-8238. No. 91-8283. No. 91-8303. No. 91-8317. No. 91-8334. No. 91-8335. No. 91-8353. No. 91-8376. No. 91-8378. No. 91-8387. No. 91-8395. No. 91-8404. No. 91-8405. No. 91-8429. No. 91-8487. No. 91-8572. No. 91-8618. No. 91-8638. No. 91-8684. No. 91-8726. No. 91-8732. No. 91-8738. ante, p. 817; ante, p. 818; ante, p. 827; ante, p. 832; ante, p. 832; ante, p. 833; ante, p. 833; ante, p. 833; ante, p. 835; ante, p. 836; ante, p. 837; ante, p. 838; ante, p. 838; ante, p. 839; ante, p. 839; ante, p. 840; ante, p. 840; ante, p. 840; ante, p. 841; ante, p. 841; ante, p. 841; ante, p. 841; ante, p. 842; ante, p. 844; ante, p. 849; ante, p. 852; ante, p. 853; ante, p. 855; ante, p. 858; ante, p. 812; ante, p. 858; No. 92-38. No. 92-48. No. 92-59. No. 92-186. No. 92-241. No. 92-248. No. 92-257. No. 92-5052. No. 92-5098. No. 92-5111. No. 92-5118. No. 92-5123. No. 92-5246. No. 92-5263. No. 92-5289. No. 92-5301. No. 92-5375. No. 92-5378. No. 92-5382. No. 92-5389. No. 92-5450. No. 92-5550. No. 92-5581. No. 92-5586. No. 92-5605. No. 92-5650. No. 92-5681. ante, p. 908; ante, p. 863; ante, p. 812; ante, p. 869; ante, p. 872; ante, p. 872; ante, p. 872; ante, p. 876; ante, p. 879; ante, p. 880; ante, p. 880; ante, p. 880; ante, p. 887; ante, p. 888; ante, p. 889; ante, p. 889; ante, p. 893; ante, p. 894; ante, p. 894; ante, p. 894; ante, p. 897; ante, p. 900; ante, p. 922; ante, p. 923; ante, p. 923; ante, p. 902; and ante, p. 943. Petitions for rehearing denied.