SANELCO, INC. AND MARYLAND CASUALTY COMPANY, PETITIONERS,
v.
ROGER WELLS AND THE FLORIDA INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION, RESPONDENTS
SANELCO, INC. AND MARYLAND CASUALTY COMPANY, PETITIONERS,
ROGER WELLS AND THE FLORIDA INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION, RESPONDENTS
229 So. 2d 855
Florida Supreme Court (1969)
Caution
Cited by 105 cases
Opinion of the Court
By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date April 4, 1969.
We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 32 F.S.A.
Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.
The petition is therefore denied.
The Petition for Attorney’s Fees is hereby granted in the amount of $250.00.
ERVIN, C. J., and ROBERTS, DREW, CARLTON and BOYD, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (52 total)
-
Brooks v. State, 762 So. 2d 879 (Fla. 2000)…and counsel is allowed to advance all legitimate arguments.' Spencer. The control of comments is within the trial court’s discretion,' and an appellate court 'will not interfere unless an abuse of such discretion is shown. Thomas; Paramare v. State, 229 So. 2d 855 (Fla.1969), modified, 408 U.S. 935, 92 S.Ct. 2857, 33 L.Ed.2d 751 (1972). A new trial - should be granted when it is “reasonably evident that the remarks might have influenced the jury to reach a more severe [*908] verdict of guilt than it would hav…
-
Cooper v. State, 336 So. 2d 1133 (Fla. 1976)…to grant severance, since a conviction for felony-murder was possible. Campbell v. State, 227 So. 2d 873 (Fla.1969). As to other points, the record shows no prejudice which would warrant a reversal of Cooper’s conviction. . See, Paramore v. State, 229 So. 2d 855 (Fla.1969). . Lego v. Twomey, 404 U.S. 477, 92 S.Ct. 619, 30 L.Ed.2d 618 (1972); MeDole v. State, 283 So. 2d 553 (Fla.1973). . Williams v. State, 264 So. 2d 106 (4th DCA 1972). . Andrews v. State, 134 Fla. 450, 184 So. 88 (1938). . 283 So. 2d 1,…
-
McArthur Breedlove v. State, 413 So. 2d 1 (Fla. 1982)…n, and counsel is allowed to advance all legitimate arguments. Spencer. The control of comments is within the trial court’s discretion, and an appellate court will not interfere unless an abuse of such discretion is shown. Thomas; Paramore v. State, 229 So. 2d 855 (Fla.1969), modified, 408 U.S. 935, 92 S.Ct. 2857, 33 L.Ed.2d 751 (1972). A new trial should be granted when it is “reasonably evident that the remarks might have influenced the jury to reach a more severe verdict of guilt than it would have otherwi…
Previewing 3 of 52 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence