MISSOURI PACIFIC RAILROAD CO.

v.

ANGLIM

Citator

Cited By

• Faragher v. City of Boca Raton, 524 U.S. 775 (U.S. 1998)
  …, 970 F. 2d 178, 184 (CA6) (holding that a supervisor’s harassment was within the scope of his employment, but nevertheless requiring the victim to show that the employer failed to respond adequately when it learned of the harassment), cert. denied, 506 U. S. 1041 (1992). In so doing, the courts have emphasized that harassment consisting of unwelcome remarks and touching is motivated solely by individual desires and serves no purpose of the employer. For this reason, courts have likened hostile environment…
• Burlington Indus., Inc. v. Ellerth, 524 U.S. 742 (U.S. 1998)
  …Frank, 42 F. 3d 503, 513-514 (CA9 1994); Bouton v. BMW of North America, Inc., 29 F. 3d 103, 106-107 (CA3 1994); Sauers v. Salt Lake County, 1 F. 3d 1122, 1127 (CA10 1993); Kauffman v. Allied Signal, Inc., 970 F. 2d 178, 185-186 (CA6), cert. denied, 506 U. S. 1041 (1992); Steele v. Offshore Shipbuilding, Inc., 867 F. 2d 1311, 1316 (CA11 1989). The rule encouraged. Title VII plaintiffs to state their claims as quid pro quo claims, which in turn put expansive pressure on the definition. The equivalence of the…
• Faragher v. City OF Boca Raton, 111 F.3d 1530 (11th Cir. 1997)
  …dinate where harassment took place at the office, during working hours and was carried out by someone -with the authority to hire, fire, promote and discipline the plaintiffs); Kauffman v. Allied Signal, Inc., 970 F. 2d 178 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 1041, 113 S.Ct. 831, 121 L.Ed.2d 701 (1992) (explaining that a relevant factor in determining if supervisor was acting “within the scope of employment” in harassing subordinate is whether the supervisor had “significant input” into personnel' decisions).…

  ← 1 / 2 →