JAMES GERTMAN

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

Citator

Cited By

• Karie Lynn Gibbs v. Gibbs, 686 So. 2d 639 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996)
  …bstantial change in conditions, we would be warranted in altering said decree only where it appears that the welfare of the children will be promoted thereby.” The following year, in Hutchins v. Hutchins, 220 So. 2d 438 (Fla. 2d DCA), cert. denied, 229 So. 2d 869 (Fla.1969), this court stated the test in terms of “detriment”: Such a rule requires, then, in modification of child custody cases, not only that the general welfare of the children will be served by a change of custody, but that it will be detrime…
• Perez v. Perez, 767 So. 2d 513 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000)
  …ine of cases decided long before the advent of shared parental responsibility when one parent, usually the mother, was given “care, custody, and control” of the children. See, e.g., Hutchins v. Hutchins, 220 So. 2d 438 (Fla. 2d DCA 1969), cert. den. 229 So. 2d 869 (modification requires showing that not only welfare of children will be served by change, but that it will be detrimental to children if custody is not changed). Other districts have not followed Grumney and Kelly, and the detriment-to-the-child s…
• CSX Transp., Inc. v. Whittler, 584 So. 2d 579 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991)
  …whether a dangerous condition exists, and whether warnings should have been given. Millar v. Tropical Glades Corporation, 99 So. 2d 589 (Fla. 3d DCA 1958) and Gifford v. Galaxie Homes of Tampa, Inc., 223 So. 2d 108 (Fla. 2d DCA 1969), cert. denied, 229 So. 2d 869 (1969) (error to refuse to permit experts to render opinions regarding whether the areas where the plaintiffs were injured were constructed and maintained according to reasonably safe standards); Scheckler v. City of Mount Dora, 395 So. 2d 1188 (Fla…

Authorities Cited

• Gertman v. State, 223 So. 2d 798 (Fla. 3d DCA 1969)