RUIZ

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Smith, 122 F.3d 1355 (11th Cir. 1997)
  …ry was so prejudicial that the district court abused its discretion in admitting it. See United States v. Fortenberry, 971 F. 2d 717, 721 (11th Cir.1992) (evidence of double murder probative and admissible in trial for gun possession), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 1068, 113 S.Ct. 1020, 122 L.Ed.2d 166 (1993). III. CONCLUSION For the foregoing reasons, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in excluding the expert testimony of Dr. Cutler, or in admitting the evidence of the SouthTrust ro…
• United States v. Dickerson, 248 F.3d 1036 (11th Cir. 2001)
  …or harmless where "the purported error had no substantial influence on the outcome and sufficient evidence uninfected by error supports the verdict." United States v. Fortenberry, 971 F. 2d 717, 722 (11th Cir.1992) (citation omitted), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 1068, 113 S.Ct. 1020, 122 L.Ed.2d 166 (1993). Even discounting the credibility of Williams' testimony, we find sufficient evidence in the record to support the jury's conclusion that Dickerson was nevertheless involved in the charged conspiracy. Cf. H…
• United States v. Fredric W. Tokars, 95 F.3d 1520 (11th Cir. 1996)
  …murders of Cline and Brown’s brother Darryl Hill. The evidence concerning these murders was relevant to present a complete account of the story of the enterprise. See United States v. Fortenberry, 971 F. 2d 717, 721 (11th Cir.1992), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 1068, 113 S.Ct. 1020, 122 L.Ed.2d 166 (1993). Moreover, the testimony did not substantially prejudice the defendants. Accordingly, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion. 5. Testimony of Agents Twibell and Davis Tokars object…