DEATON
v.
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
DEATON
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
507 U.S. 915
Supreme Court of the United States (1993)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Indus. Risk Insurers v. M.A.N. Gutehoffnungshutte GmbH, 141 F.3d 1434 (11th Cir. 1998)…)(2) of the New York Convention. C. Finally, the appellants also argue that the arbitral award should be vacated on the ground that it is “arbitrary and capricious.” See, e.g., Ainsworth v. Skumick, 960 F. 2d 939, 941 (11th Cir.1992), cert. denied, 507 U.S. 915, 113 S.Ct. 1269, 122 L.Ed.2d 665 (1993). We reject this argument as well. Under the law of this circuit, domestic arbitral awards may be vacated for six different reasons; four are enumerated by the FAA and two are non-statutory defenses against en…
-
Delfina Montes v. Shearson Lehman Bros., Inc., 128 F.3d 1456 (11th Cir. 1997)…ve recognized two additional non-statutory bases upon which an arbitration award may be vacated. First, an arbitration award may be vacated if it is arbitrary and capricious. Ainsworth v. Skurnick, 960 F. 2d 939, 941 (11th Cir. 1992), cert. denied, 507 U.S. 915, 113 S.Ct. 1269, 122 L.Ed.2d 665 (1993); Raiford v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., 903 F. 2d 1410, 1413 (11th Cir.1990); United States Postal Serv. v. National Ass’n of Letter Carriers, 847 F. 2d 775, 778 (11th Cir.1988). Second, an a…1 / 2