PETER NIKOLAS, APPELLANT,
v.
CONSTANTINE D. ALLEN AND COULA C. ALLEN, APPELLEES
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that the evidence was sufficient to support the judgment and that the trial court did not err in denying the petition for rehearing.
A husband transferred a large sum of money, liquidated from his assets, to the appellant five days before filing for divorce. The trial court found th…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Fraudulent Transfer cases and more on FLexlaw
The husband in a divorce case transferred a large sum of money to the appellant. The money was gathered together by the liquidation of almost all of the husband’s assets, and the transfer was made five days before the husband filed suit for divorce. The trial court found that the transfer was fraudulent. The appellant, who had received the funds, brings this appeal to reverse the judgment in favor of the appellee, the wife in the divorce case.
Two points are presented. The first urges that the evidence is insufficient to support the judgment. We have reviewed the record and hold that the evidence is sufficient. See Frell v. Frell, Fla.App.1963, 154 So.2d 706.
The second point urges error in the denial of appellant’s petition for rehearing which was based upon newly discovered evidence. The alleged newly discovered *57evidence did not meet the requirements set out in Dade National Bank of Miami v. Kay, Fla.App.1961, 131 So.2d 24, and Drew v. Chambers, Fla.App.1961, 133 So.2d 589. Therefore no error has been shown.
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Dade Nat'l Bank OF Miami v. KAY, 131 So. 2d 24 (Fla. 3d DCA 1961)
- J. C. Frell and Jeanne v. Frell, 154 So. 2d 706 (Fla. 3d DCA 1963)
- Drew v. Chambers, 133 So. 2d 589 (Fla. 1st DCA 1961)