COOPER

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Ruth v. Dep't OF Legal Affairs, 684 So. 2d 181 (Fla. 1996)
  …McPherson Lane, 754 F.Supp. 1483 (D.Nev. 1991), ajfd 32 F. 3d 573 (9th Cir.1994), cert. dismissed, — U.S: —, 115 S.Ct. 536, 130 L.Ed.2d 438 (1994), and United States v. Accounts Nos. 3034504504 & 144-07143, 971 F. 2d 974 (3d Cir.1992), cert. denied, 507 U.S. 985, 113 S.Ct. 1580, 123 L.Ed.2d 148 (1993), the trial court in this case, although it did not do so,7 had jurisdiction to adjudicate the right to the property as between Ruth and the State. Ruth, 661 So. 2d at 904. That authority, the district court de…
• Banco Lavra, S.A. v. Cargil Int'l, 732 So. 2d 1086 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998)
  …e requirements of the letter of credit. The beneficiary does not warrant the veracity or conditions of compliance with the underlying commercial contract. See Amwest Surety Ins. Co. v. Republic Nat’l Bank, 977 F. 2d 122 (4th Cir.1992), cert. denied, 507 U.S. 985, 113 S.Ct. 1582, 123 L.Ed.2d 149 (1993). In Amwest, the court held that if section 5-111(1) of the U.C.C. was interpreted to allow issuing banks to recover funds paid in honoring a complying draft based on the veracity of included statements, such a…
• United States v. Paradies, 98 F.3d 1266 (11th Cir. 1996)
  …s specifically held under similar circumstances that the district court did not err in instructing the jury that “every person is presumed to know what the law forbids.” United States v. Hollis, 971 F. 2d 1441, 1451-52 (10th Cir.1992), cert. denied, 507 U.S. 985, 113 S.Ct. 1580, 123 L.Ed.2d 148 (1993). In light of the foregoing, we must reject the Paradies defendants’ argument on this point. Next, they argue that the court gave, in substance, a general intent instruction rather than a specific intent instr…