PEREZ

v.

STARK ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Godinez v. Moran, 509 U.S. 389 (U.S. 1993)
  …2d 633, 638 (CA7 1981); White Hawk v. Solem, 693 F. 2d 825, 829-830, n. 7 (CA8 1982), cert. denied, 460 U. S. 1054 (1983); Wolf v. United States, 430 F. 2d 443, 444 (CA10 1970); United States v. Simmons, 961 F. 2d 183, 187 (CA11 1992), cert. denied, 507 U. S. 989 (1993). Three of those same Circuits, however, have indicated that the competency standard for waiving the right to counsel is “vaguely higher” than the competency standard for standing trial, see United States ex rel. Konigsberg v. Vincent, 526 F…
• United States v. Trujillo, 146 F.3d 838 (11th Cir. 1998)
  …trict court’s determination whether to strike an entire jury panel for manifest abuse of discretion. See United States v. Simmons, 961 F. 2d 183, 184 (11th Cir.1992) (citing United States v. Muller, 698 F. 2d 442, 444 (11th Cir.1983)), cert. denied, 507 U.S. 989, 113 S.Ct. 1591, 123 L.Ed.2d 156 (1993). The party challenging the refusal to strike a panel “must demonstrate that the juror in question exhibited actual bias: That is, either an express admission of bias, or proof of specific facts showing such…
• United States v. Donn Darryl Bernardine, 73 F.3d 1078 (11th Cir. 1996)
  …ormation by evidence adequate to satisfy the judicial skepticism aroused by the lengthier sentence that the proffered information would require the district court to impose. United States v. Wise, 976 F. 2d 393, 402-03 (8th Cir.1992), cert. denied, 507 U.S. 989, 113 S.Ct. 1592, 123 L.Ed.2d 157 (1993).. Moreover, while the Guidelines allow a district court to ‘consider relevant information without regard to its admissibility under the rules of evidence applicable at trial, provided that the information has…