HINES
v.
VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER ET AL.
HINES
VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER ET AL.
507 U.S. 998
Supreme Court of the United States (1993)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Ashley v. State, 925 So. 2d 1117 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006)…rent to both with cocaine base and cash. In determining whether a person knowingly maintains a premises, “renting or furnishing the site” are relevant factors to consider. United States v. Clavis, 956 F. 2d 1079, 1091 (11th Cir.1992), cert. denied, 507 U.S. 998, 113 S.Ct. 1619, 123 L.Ed.2d 178 (1993). Moreover, the jury could have inferred that Craig “maintained the house because he lived there.” United States v. Onick, 889 F. 2d 1425, 1431 (5th Cir.1989). Based on the evidence, the district court did not…
-
United States v. Owens, 103 F.3d 953 (11th Cir. 1997)…er whether the effect of the statute is uncertain with respect to other litigants. See United States v. Nat’l Dairy Products Corp., 372 U.S. 29, 83 S.Ct. 594, 9 L.Ed.2d 561 (1963); United States v. Hicks, 980 F. 2d 963 (5th Cir.1992), cert. denied, 507 U.S. 998, 113 S.Ct. 1618, 123 L.Ed.2d 178 (1993). B. Whether the district court’s jury instructions constituted reversible error. Appellant contends that the district court’s jury instructions amounted to reversible error. At the charge conferences, appella…