WOOLUM

v.

BANK ONE, LEXINGTON, N. A.

Citator

Cited By

• ST. John v. Coisman, 799 So. 2d 1110 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001)
  …768.73, because that is the statute in effect when this cause of action arose.4 See Smith v. Department of Insurance, 507 So. 2d 1080 (Fla.1987); Gordon v. State, 585 So. 2d 1033 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991), approved, 608 So. 2d 800 (Fla.1992), cert. denied, 507 U.S. 1005, 113 S.Ct. 1647, 123 L.Ed.2d 268 (1993). The 1993 version of this statute was limited by its statutory language,5 to civil actions based on “negligence, strict liability, products liability, misconduct in commercial transactions, professional liabil…
• Payroll, Inc. v. Elicker, 668 So. 2d 1035 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996)
  …. To the extent that Appellant has argued that chapter 468 governs the contractual relationship between the parties, its reliance is misplaced. As stated by the Florida Supreme Court in Gordon v. State, 608 So. 2d 800, 802 (Fla.1992), cert. denied, 507 U.S. 1005, 113 S.Ct. 1647, 123 L.Ed.2d 268 (Fla.1993), "[v]alid laws in effect at the time a contract is made enter into and become part of the contract as if expressly incorporated into the contract." In this case, however, the mandatory provisions governing…