WILLIS
v.
UNITED STATES

U.S. | 1993-03-29
No. 92-6735
507 U.S. 1007 Supreme Court of the United States (1993) Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Shoop v. Hill., 139 S. Ct. 504 (U.S. 2019)
    …respondent Danny Hill was convicted for torturing, raping, and murdering Raymond, and he was sentenced to death. An intermediate appellate court affirmed his conviction and sentence, as did the Ohio Supreme Court. We denied certiorari. Hill v. Ohio, 507 U.S. 1007, 113 S.Ct. 1651, 123 L.Ed.2d 272 (1993). After unsuccessful efforts to obtain postconviction relief in state and federal court, Hill filed a new petition in the Ohio courts contending that his death sentence is illegal under Atkins v. Virginia, 53…
  • Alphonso Cave v. Singletary, 84 F.3d 1350 (11th Cir. 1996)
    …te fails to retry or resentence the petitioner within the designated period of time, it may still rearrest and retry or resentence the successful habeas petitioner at a later time. See Moore v. Zant, 972 F. 2d 318, 320 (11th Cir.1992), cert. denied, 507 U.S. 1007, 113 S.Ct. 1650, 123 L.Ed.2d 271 (1993). The question presented here, however, is whether a habeas court has the authority to issue a conditional order permanently forbidding reprosecution or resentencing if the state fails to act within a specifi…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw