WHITE
v.
UNITED STATES; AND WILSON V. UNITED STATES

U.S. | 1993-03-29
Nos. 92-7162; No. 92-7184
507 U.S. 1007 Supreme Court of the United States (1993) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Shoop v. Hill., 139 S. Ct. 504 (U.S. 2019)
  • Alphonso Cave v. Singletary, 84 F.3d 1350 (11th Cir. 1996)
    …te fails to retry or resentence the petitioner within the designated period of time, it may still rearrest and retry or resentence the successful habeas petitioner at a later time. See Moore v. Zant, 972 F. 2d 318, 320 (11th Cir.1992), cert. denied, 507 U.S. 1007, 113 S.Ct. 1650, 123 L.Ed.2d 271 (1993). The question presented here, however, is whether a habeas court has the authority to issue a conditional order permanently forbidding reprosecution or resentencing if the state fails to act within a specifi…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw