MEDLEY
v.
MARYLAND
MEDLEY
MARYLAND
507 U.S. 1023
Supreme Court of the United States (1993)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
United States v. Garcia, 208 F.3d 1258 (11th Cir. 2000)…ion is the intention of the actor, not the actual success of his obstructive acts. United States v. Revel, 971 F. 2d 656, 660-661 (11th Cir.1992) cert. denied in Pullam v. United States, 507 U.S. 1012, 113 S.Ct. 1665, 123 L.Ed.2d 283; cert. denied, 507 U.S. 1023, 113 S.Ct. 1828, 123 L.Ed.2d 457. Appellant’s final argument is that the sentencing court erred in finding that he had failed to show the acceptance of responsibility for his offense that would warrant a reduction under Sentencing Guidelines § 3E1.…