REICHELT
v.
GATES ET AL.
REICHELT
GATES ET AL.
507 U.S. 1028
Supreme Court of the United States (1993)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Dissent
Justice Stevens,
dissenting.
For the reasons expressed in Brown v. Herald Co., 464 U. S. 928 (1983), I would deny the petition for writ of certiorari without reaching the merits of the motion to proceed in forma pauperis.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Am. Dredging Co. v. Miller, 510 U.S. 443 (U.S. 1994)…non conveniens unavailable in Jones Act and maritime law cases brought in Louisiana state courts, is not preempted by federal maritime law. 595 So. 2d 615 (1992). American Dredging Company filed a petition for a writ of certiorari, which we granted. 507 U. S. 1028 (1993). II The Constitution provides that the federal judicial power “shall extend ... to all Cases of admiralty and maritime Jurisdiction.” U. S. Const., Art. Ill, §2, cl. 1. Federal-court jurisdiction over such cases, however, has never been ent…
-
Hagen v. Utah, 510 U.S. 399 (U.S. 1994)…iction over unallotted opened lands if the applicable surplus land Act freed that land of its reservation status and thereby diminished the reservation boundaries”). The court accordingly reinstated petitioner’s conviction. We granted certiorari, 507 U. S. 1028 (1993), to resolve the direct conflict between these decisions of the Tenth Circuit and the Utah Supreme Court on the question whether the Uintah Reservation has been diminished. Ill We first address a threshold question: whether the State of Utah…
Authorities Cited
- Turner v. Cnty. of Siskiyou, 464 U.S. 928 (U.S. 1983)