STATE, EX REL. A. E. LICHTENSTEIN,
v.
D. C. COLEMAN, AS SHERIFF OF DADE COUNTY

Fla. | 1938-09-20
Ellis, C. J., and Whitfield, Terrell, Brown, Buford and Chapman, J. J., concur.
134 Fla. 129 Florida Supreme Court (1938)
Also reported at: 183 So. 730

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

The Florida Supreme Court held that a portion of Chapter 17894 of the Acts of 1937 was unconstitutional because its title was misleading and did not fairly express the subject of creating criminal offenses. The Court found that crimes must be defined by impartial authority to satisfy due process.


Holding

Yes, the criminal features of Chapter 17894 violate Section 16, Article III of the Florida Constitution because the title does not fairly express the subject of creating criminal offenses. Therefore, these criminal features are inoperative.


Key Quotes

“The title of the Act is, therefore, misleading as to the provisions in the statute relating to criminal offenses, in that it does not fairly express a subject sufficiently comprehensive to make the creation of criminal offenses for violations of the rules and regulations of the State Board either a part of the subject expressed in the title or matter properly connected therewith; consequently the criminal features of the Act violate Section 16, Article III, of the State Constitution and are inoperative.”

This quote explains the primary reason for the Court's decision, focusing on the violation of the constitutional requirement for a clear and comprehensive title.

Previewing 1 of 2 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

The case involved a challenge to Chapter 17894, Acts of 1937, which regulated certain subjects. The challenger argued that the Act's provisions creati…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam.

*130Per Curiam.

Chapter 17894, Acts of 1937, supersedes prior enactments on the subject regulated, and the nature of the subject as expressed in the title of the Act does not indicate that a violation of the rules and regulations authorized by the statute might be made a criminal offense. The title of the Act is, therefore, misleading as to the provisions in the statute relating to criminal offenses, in that it does not fairly express a subject sufficiently comprehensive to make the creation of criminal offenses for violations of the rules and regulations of the State Board either a_ part of the subject expressed in the title or matter properly connected therewith; consequently the criminal features of the Act violate Section 16, Article III, of the State Constitution and are inoperative.

Chapter 17894 under its defective title does not legally define a misdemeanor that may be punished under Section 7104 C. G. L., even if violation of rules and regulations of an Administrative Board may legally be made a crime punishable by imprisonment without violating the due process and equal protection of the laws provisions of the State and Federal Constitutions, when, as here, the Board making the rules and regulations is, with one exception, composed of members of designated classes who are directly and vitally interested in enforcing the statute for their peculiar financial benefit.

Crimes to be punished by imprisonment must be defined by competent impartial authority in order to afford due process and equal protection of the laws.

Rehearing denied.

Ellis, C. J., and Whitfield, Terrell, Brown, Buford and Chapman, J. J., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw