CARIDAD SANCHEZ, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1970-02-03
Nos. 69-328, 69-549
Before PEARSON, C. J., and BARK-DULL and SWANN, JJ.
231 So. 2d 10 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1970) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • City OF Miami v. Fla. E. Coast Ry. Co., 278 So. 2d 678 (Fla. 3d DCA 1973)
    …PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See City of Miami v. Florida East Coast Railway Company, Fla.App. 1970, 231 So. 2d 10, State Department of Transportation v. Florida East Coast Railway Company, Fla.App.1973, 275 So. 2d 289.…
  • State v. Fla. E. Coast Ry. Co., 239 So. 2d 587 (Fla. 1970)
    …uction purposes. Although this fact might logically work an estoppel against the City so far as concerns whatever rights it might seek to assert under principles of statutory dedication (see City of Miami v. Florida East Coast Railway Co., Fla.App., 231 So. 2d 10), similar equitable principles simply do not apply as against the Department, which was not privy to or bound by the expired easement agreement entered into by the City or the latter’s extension thereof. Here, we are dealing with a statute of repose…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw