GARY LEE ESTABROOK, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Wallace v. Rashkow, 270 So. 2d 743 (Fla. 3d DCA 1972)
  …This was a question of fact properly decided by the jury. Pensacola Transit Co. v. Denton, Fla.App.1960, 119 So. 2d 296. Stark v. Vasquez, Fla.1964, 168 So. 2d 140. Keyser v. Brunette, Fla.App. 1966, 188 So. 2d 840. O’Brien v. Francis, Fla.App.1970, 231 So. 2d 13. Affirmed.…
• Belcher v. First Nat'l Bank OF Miami, 405 So. 2d 754 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981)
  …NBM. For many years the rule in Florida was that a defendant could not appeal a judgment exonerating a codefendant because there was no contribution among tort-feasors. Jackson v. Florida Weathermakers, 55 So. 2d 575 (Fla.1951); O’Brien v. Francis, 231 So. 2d 13 (Fla.3d DCA 1970); see also Durbin Paper Stock Co. v. Watson-David Insurance Co., 167 So. 2d 34 (Fla.3d DCA 1964), cert. denied, 172 So. 2d 596 (Fla. 1965). Appellants argue that this rule no longer pertains, and relying upon Pensacola Interstate Fa…
• N. Shore Hosp. v. Martin, 344 So. 2d 256 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977)
  …t they cannot, under the facts of this case. The appellee contends that a codefendant cannot challenge a verdict rendered in favor of another codefendant. While this rule appears to be firmly established in Florida case law, see O’Brien v. Francis, 231 So. 2d 13, 14 n. 1 (Fla.3d DCA 1970), our examination of decisions bearing on this point has disclosed that such cases were bottomed on the premise that there was no common law contribution among joint tort-feasors. See Jackson v. Florida Weathermakers, Inc.,…