MCKINNON

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Norwegian Cruise Lines, Ltd. v. Gregorio Zareno, 712 So. 2d 791 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998)
  …some discord in that law.” Pacific Merchant Shipping Ass’n v. Aubry, 918 F. 2d at 1424. The state law must “unduly disrupt” admiralty to be preempted. Id. at 1424. See also Ellenwood v. Exxon Shipping Co., 984 F. 2d 1270, (1st. Cir.), cert. denied, 508 U.S. 981, 113 S.Ct. 2987, 125 L.Ed.2d 682 (1993)(state law preempted only if found in direct conflict with basic maritime principles). Therefore we must determine whether the requirement in Section 768.72 of showing a reasonable basis for punitive damages co…
• In re Olympia Holding Corp. v. Frito-Lay, Inc., 88 F.3d 952 (11th Cir. 1996)
  …ng a challenge to the "lawfulness,” as opposed to the "legality,” of a series of rates. Id. at 193; see I.C.C. v. Transcon Lines, 990 F. 2d 1503, 1515 (9th Cir.1992), vacated and remanded, 508 U.S. 969, 113 S.Ct. 2955, 125 L.Ed.2d 657, cert. denied, 508 U.S. 981, 113 S.Ct. 2987, 125 L.Ed.2d 683 (1993). Relying on Transcon, the court found it necessary to draw a distinction between the two types of challenges because it was persuaded by Transcon's reasoning that a carrier does have "standing to challenge t…