PICART

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Calderon, 127 F.3d 1314 (11th Cir. 1997)
  …ns based on a variance unless that variance was: (1) material; and (2) substantially prejudicial to the defendant. United States v. Coy, 19 F. 3d 629, 632 (11th Cir.) (citing United States v. Reed, 980 F. 2d 1568, 1581 (11th Cir.1993), cert. denied, 509 U.S. 932, 113 S.Ct. 3063, 125 L.Ed.2d 745 (1993)), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1006, 115 S.Ct. 525, 130 L.Ed.2d 429 (1994). Thus, a two step inquiry is required. First, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the government as we must do in all suff…
• United States v. Brazel, 102 F.3d 1120 (11th Cir. 1997)
  …with evidence introduced later at trial.” Richardson v. Marsh, 481 U.S. 200, 208, 107 S.Ct. 1702, 1707, 95 L.Ed.2d 176 (1987); United States v. Arias, 984 F. 2d 1139, 1142 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 508 U.S. 979, 113 S.Ct. 2979, 125 L.Ed.2d 676 and 509 U.S. 932, 113 S.Ct. 3062, 125 L.Ed.2d 744 (1993). Thus, “[f]or Bruton to apply, a eodefendant’s statement must be clearly inculpatory standing alone.” Arias, 984 F. 2d at 1142 (citation omitted). McNealy challenges two aspects of Thomas’s testimony. First,…