HERBERT HENDERSON AND JAMES EDWARD JOSEPH, APPELLANTS,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1970-02-10
No. 69-502
Before PEARSON, C. J., and BARK-DULL and HENDRY, JTJ.
231 So. 2d 231 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1970) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The court held that failure to notify a minor's parents of criminal proceedings requires reversal for that minor, even if evidence is otherwise sufficient.


Facts & Procedural History

Two minors were convicted of assault with intent to commit rape. Proper notice was given to one minor's parents, but not the other's, as required by s…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

The appellants appeal their conviction in the criminal court of record of assault with intent to commit rape. Both of the appellants were minors at the time of the trial. A reversal is urged because of the failure of the State to properly notify the parents of the appellant Henderson of the proceedings, pursuant to § 932.38, Fla.Stat., F.S.A. It is conceded that proper notice was given to the parents of the appellant Joseph.

We have reviewed the Evidence and find it is sufficient to support the convictions. However, we are required to reverse as to the appellant Henderson because of the failure of the State to comply with the aforesaid statute.

Therefore, the judgment of conviction and sentence as to the appellant Joseph be and the same is hereby affirmed. As to the appellant Henderson, the judgment of conviction and sentence be and the same is hereby set aside, with directions to grant said appellant a new trial. See: Jackson v. State, Fla.App.1969, 224 So.2d 734.

Affirmed in part; reversed in part with directions.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • State v. Morris, 311 So. 2d 728 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975)
    …. Cochran, 132 So. 2d 196 (Fla.1961); Di Marco v. Cochran, 127 So. 2d 674 (Fla.1961); Williams v. Cochran, 126 So. 2d 887 (Fla.1961); Tharpe v. State, 273 So. 2d 399 (Fla.App.1973); Romero v. State, 251 So. 2d 137 (Fla.App.1971); Henderson v. State, 231 So. 2d 231 (Fla.App.1970). In the instant case, the defendant was an unmarried minor at the time he was charged with robbery. The defendant, however, reached majority prior to June 13, 1974, the date scheduled for his retrial on the robbery charge. Under thes…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw