SMITH
v.
UNITED STATES; FULLER V. TEXAS; BROOKE GROUP LTD. V. BROWN & WILLIAMSON TOBACCO CORP.; SHERMOEN ET AL. V. UNITED STATES ET AL.; RESHARD ET AL. V. BRITT ET AL.; BOWMAN ET AL. V. CITY OF FRANKLIN, WISCONSIN, ET AL.; CENTURY CENTRE PARTNERS, LTD. V. FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION; FERGUSON V. UNION CITY DAILY MESSENGER ET AL.; CENTRAL STATES, SOUTHEAST AND SOUTHWEST AREAS PENSION FUND ET AL. V. CROWN CORK & SEAL CO., INC.; MALONEY V. SALAFIA ET AL.; JOHNSON ET AL. V. LOS ANGELES COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT ET AL.; ESTATE OF BOHN ET AL. V. WADDELL, DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE OF ARIZONA, ET AL.; AND ABBOTT ET AL. V. WADDELL, DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE OF ARIZONA, ET AL.; ICARD, TRUSTEE, ET AL. V. SARASOTA-MANATEE AIRPORT AUTHORITY; BRICKNER V. VOINOVICH, GOVERNOR OF OHIO, ET AL.; GACKENBACH V. DEXTER HYSOL CORP.; HUDDLESTON, TENNESSEE COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE, ET AL. V. BLOOMINGDALE'S BY MAIL LTD.; JOHNSON V. TEXAS; CARNEY V. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS; SWARTZ V. FLORIDA BAR ET AL.; CANTU V. TEXAS; RESNOVER V. CARTER, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF INDIANA, ET AL.; HAWTHORNE V. VASQUEZ, WARDEN; WARD V. WHITLEY, WARDEN; JENKINS V. FIRST FIDELITY MORTGAGE CO.; LOGAN V. GRAMLEY, WARDEN; TAVAKOLI-NOURI V. CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY; BANKS V. SAN DIEGO; BANKS V. CALIFORNIA; BANKS V. SAN DIEGO; ANDERS V. UNITED STATES; BANKS V. RYAN ET AL.; INOCELDA V. DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY; SIMANONOK V. SIMANONOK ET AL.; HUGHLEY V. TENNESSEE ET AL.; SANDERS V. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE; HUGHLEY V. UNITED STATES; HART V. ALABAMA; GILBERT V. BAY AREA RAPID TRANSIT DISTRICT; LUGO V. INDEPENDENT MANAGEMENT ASSN. ET AL.; REID V. GUDMANSON, WARDEN, ET AL.; IN RE LEUELLYN, SMITH V. CUSTOM MICRO, INC.; MORELAND V. TEXAS; PARRIS V. UNITED STATES; MYER V. WEEKS ET AL., HICKEY ET AL. V. BALLINGALL ET AL.; ERWIN V. CITY OF ANGELS CAMP ET AL.; IN RE ZIEBARTH, BANKS V. KCTV-5 ET AL.; NKOP V. VAN RUNKLE ET AL.; ROCHEVILLE V. SOUTH CAROLINA, IN RE DIVITO; WEST V. TRUMAN MEDICAL CENTER WEST, INC., ET AL.; CLARK V. GOVERNMENT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS; VELASQUEZ V. UNITED STATES, IN RE O'LEARY; BLACK V. KIRKPATRICK ET AL.; SEATON V. JABE, WARDEN; ZUCKERMAN V. UNITED STATES

U.S. | 1993-08-09
Nos. 91-8674; No. 91-8768; No. 92-466; No. 92-1541; No. 92-1549; No. 92-1608; No. 92-1650; No. 92-1670; No. 92-1671; No. 92-1705; No. 92-1731; No. 92-1748; No. 92-1749; No. 92-1766; No. 92-1822; No. 92-1886; No. 92-5653; No. 92-6494; No. 92-6730; No. 92-7120; No. 92-7802; No. 92-7862; No. 92-7914; No. 92-7942; No. 92-7998; No. 92-8038; No. 92-8061; No. 92-8062; No. 92-8063; No. 92-8094; No. 92-8120; No. 92-8133; No. 92-8146; No. 92-8220; No. 92-8249; No. 92-8251; No. 92-8298; No. 92-8301; No. 92-8314; No. 92-8317; No. 92-8333; No. 92-8338; No. 92-8349; No. 92-8353; No. 92-8354; No. 92-8424; No. 92-8436; No. 92-8470; No. 92-8490; No. 92-8537; No. 92-8563; No. 92-8588; No. 92-8589; No. 92-8615; No. 92-8634; No. 92-8646; No. 92-8683; No. 92-8716; No. 92-8725
509 U.S. 940 Supreme Court of the United States (1993)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

This document is a Supreme Court orders list from August 9, 1993, containing petitions for rehearing that were denied across numerous cases spanning diverse areas of law including criminal justice, tax, administrative, and civil litigation. The Court disposed of approximately 48 petitions for rehearing by denying them without further opinion or explanation.


© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.

Opinion of the Court

508 U. S. 223; ante, p. 922; ante, p. 209; ante, p. 903; 508 U. S. 911; 508 U. S. 940; ante, p. 905; 508 U. S. 961; 508 U. S. 972; 508 U. S. 951; ante, p. 906; ante, p. 906; ante, p. 906; 508 U. S. 974; ante, p. 907; ante, p. 907; ante, p. 350; 506 U. S. 1061; 508 U. S. 914; ante, p. 926; 508 U. S. 962; 507 U. S. 1053; 508 U. S. 963; 508 U. S. 918; 507 U. S. 1042; 508 U. S. 942; 508 U. S. 921; 508 U. S. 921; 508 U. S. 921; 507 U. S. 1057; 508 U. S. 923; 508 U. S. 924; 508 U. S. 925; 508 U. S. 927; 508 U. S. 963; 508 U. S. 928; 508 U. S. 953; 508 U. S. 963; 508 U. S. 975; 508 U. S. 964; 508 U. S. 958; 508 U. S. 976; 508 U. S. 976; 508 U. S. 954; 508 U. S. 976; 608 U. S. 981; ante, p. 908; 508 U. S. 938; 508 U. S. 978; 508 U. S. 978; 508 Ü. S. 978; ante, p. 902; ante, p. 929; ante, p. 910; 508 U. S. 979; ante, p. 921; ante, p. 911; ante, p. 911; and ante, p.

915. Petitions for rehearing denied. No. 92-1608. No. 92-1650. No. 92-1670. No. 92-1671. No. 92-1705. No. 92-1731. No. 92-1748. No. 92-1749. No. 92-1766. No. 92-1822. No. 92-1886. No. 92-5653. No. 92-6494. No. 92-6730. No. 92-7120. No. 92-7802. No. 92-7862. No. 92-7914. No. 92-7942. No. 92-7998. No. 92-8038. No. 92-8061. No. 92-8062. No. 92-8063. No. 92-8094. No. 92-8120. No. 92-8133. No. 92-8146. No. 92-8220. No. 92-8249. No. 92-8251. No. 92-8298. No. 92-8301. No. 92-8314. No. 92-8317. No. 92-8333. No. 92-8338. No. 92-8349. No. 92-8353. No. 92-8354. No. 92-8424. No. 92-8436. No. 92-8470. No. 92-8490. No. 92-8537. No. 92-8563. No. 92-8588. No. 92-8589. No. 92-8615. No. 92-8634. No. 92-8646. No. 92-8683. No. 92-8716. No. 92-8725.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited (59 total)

View all 59 cited authorities →

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw