CAVANAUGH, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF PROBATION, PAROLE, AND PARDON SERVICES, ET AL.
v.
ROLLER
CAVANAUGH, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF PROBATION, PAROLE, AND PARDON SERVICES, ET AL.
ROLLER
510 U.S. 42
Supreme Court of the United States (1993)
Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 126 L. Ed. 2d 409 · 114 S. Ct. 593 · 1993 U.S. LEXIS 7636 · SCDB 1993-006
Cited by 2 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.
The writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Cal. Dep't of Corr. v. Morales, 514 U.S. 499 (U.S. 1995)…ost Facto Clause. It is thus no surprise that nearly every Federal Court of Appeals and State Supreme Court to consider the issue has so held. See, e. g., 16 F. 3d 1001 (CA9 1994) (case below); Roller v. Cavanaugh, 984 F. 2d 120 (CA4), cert. dism’d, 510 U. S. 42 (1993); Akins v. Snow, 922 F. 2d 1558 (CA11), cert. denied, 501 U. S. 1260 (1991); Rodriguez v. United States Parole Commission, 594 F. 2d 170 (CA7 1979); State v. Reynolds, 642 A. 2d 1368 (N. H. 1994); Griffin v. State, 315 S. C. 285, 433 S. E. 2d…
Authorities Cited
- Qureshi v. Alexandria Hosp., 509 U.S. 920 (U.S. 1993)