STATE OF FLORIDA EX REL. EUGENIO AMARO, RELATOR,
v.
HONORABLE MURRAY GOODMAN, AS ONE OF THE JUDGES OF THE CRIMINAL COURT OF RECORD FOR DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA, RESPONDENT

Fla. 3d DCA | 1970-01-20
No. 69-948
Before PEARSON, C. J., and CHARLES CARROLL and SWANN, JJ.
231 So. 2d 271 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1970) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

This court having issued a rule nisi in prohibition herein, and the cause having come on for hearing following the filing of the response and the briefs of the parties, and this court having considered the pleadings and briefs and arguments of counsel, and being of the opinion that no sufficient showing has been made for the issuance of a writ of prohibition, the rule nisi heretofore issued in this cause is discharged and the suggestion in prohibition is dismissed on authority of Hart v. State, 144 Fla. 409, 198 So. 120, 125.

It is so ordered.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Giamo v. State, 245 So. 2d 116 (Fla. 3d DCA 1971)
    …he 11th judicial circuit by executive order pursuant to F.S. § 27.14, F.S.A. This point has been decided by this court adversely to appellant’s position. Hart v. State, 144 Fla. 409, 198 So. 120 (1940); State ex rel. Amaro v. Goodman, Fla.App. 1970, 231 So. 2d 271. The remaining points claim error requiring reversal for a new trial because of evidentiary and procedural rulings during the progress of the trial. We turn first to the rulings on evidence. It is urged that the testimony of Officer Klein relative…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw