ROSE POWELL AND WILLIAM C. POWELL, HER HUSBAND, PETITIONERS,
v.
W. A. HENRY, C/B/A W. A. HENRY & SONS, HAROLD G. O'QUINN, AND KENNETH ADAIR, RESPONDENTS
ROSE POWELL AND WILLIAM C. POWELL, HER HUSBAND, PETITIONERS,
W. A. HENRY, C/B/A W. A. HENRY & SONS, HAROLD G. O'QUINN, AND KENNETH ADAIR, RESPONDENTS
231 So. 2d 518
Florida Supreme Court (1970)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
The petition for writ of certiorari reflected probable jurisdiction in this Court. After argument and upon further consideration, we have determined that the writ was improvidently issued. The writ must be and is discharged and the petition is dismissed.
It is so ordered.
DREW, CARLTON and ADKINS, JJ., and HENDRY, District Judge, concur.
ERVIN, C. J., dissents.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Pullman, Inc. v. Johnson, 543 So. 2d 231 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987)…tual Insurance Co., 445 So. 2d 1082 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984); Garcia v. Mid-Florida Hauling, Inc., 350 So. 2d 1141 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977); Foster v. Lee, 226 So. 2d 282 (Fla. 2d DCA 1969); Powell v. Henry, 224 So. 2d 730 (Fla. 2d DCA 1969), cert. dismissed, 231 So. 2d 518 (Fla.1970). See also Meister v. Fisher, 462 So. 2d 1071 (Fla.1984) (a golf cart is clearly a motorized vehicle, and qualifies as a dangerous instrumental! [*232] ty). Therefore, as to the appellant Pullman, the judgment is reversed.1 However, the t…