CHARLES SEELY. APPELLANT,
v.
THE HERTZ CORPORATION, A DELAWARE CORPORATION, AND WILLIAM TAYLOR, APPELLEES
CHARLES SEELY. APPELLANT,
THE HERTZ CORPORATION, A DELAWARE CORPORATION, AND WILLIAM TAYLOR, APPELLEES
231 So. 2d 547
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1970)
Opinion of the Court
We have examined the record and the appellate presentation and find that the presumption of correctness which accompanies orders allowing a new trial has not been overcome. No abuse of discretion having been demonstrated, the order granting a new trial is hereby affirmed. Cloud v. Fallis, Fla. 1959, 110 So.2d 669; City of Fort Pierce v. Cooper, Fla.App.1966, 190 So.2d 12; and Volk v. Goetz, Fla.App. 1967, 206 So.2d 250; 2 Fla.Jur., Appeals, § 317.
Affirmed.
WALDEN, REED, and OWEN, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Cloud v. Fallis, 110 So. 2d 669 (Fla. 1959)
- Volk v. Goetz, 206 So. 2d 250 (Fla. 4th DCA 1967)
- State of Fla. ex rel. Evelyne M. Greene v. Doyle Conner, 190 So. 2d 12 (Fla. 1st DCA 1966)
- City OF Fort Pierce v. Cooper, 190 So. 2d 12 (Fla. 4th DCA 1966)