REM

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Custis v. United States, 511 U.S. 485 (U.S. 1994)
  …federalism as other factors weighing against permitting collateral attacks. “ ‘Federal courts are not forums in which to relitigate state trials.’ ” 988 F. 2d, at 1361, quoting Barefoot v. Estelle, 463 U. S. 880, 887 (1983). We granted certiorari, 510 U. S. 913 (1993), because the Court of Appeals’ decision conflicted with recent decisions from other Courts of Appeals that permitted defendants to challenge prior convictions that are used in sentencing under § 924(e)(1).1 Custis argues that the ACCA should…
• Lowe's Home Ctrs., Inc. v. Olin Corp., 313 F.3d 1307 (11th Cir. 2002)
  …e Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Roden-ticide Act (“FIFRA”), 7 U.S.C. § 136, et. seq. The district court entered summary judgment in favor of Olin based upon this court’s decision in Papas v. Upjohn Co., 985 F. 2d 516 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 913, 114 S.Ct. 300, 126 L.Ed.2d 248 (1993) (“Papas II ”). Lowe’s appeals from the entry of summary judgment on Olin’s behalf as well as the district court’s denial of Lowe’s’ motion for leave to amend its first amended complaint. Because we find that…

  ← 1 / 2 →